About Us How to file a complaint Outcomes of past hearings Speaker Services Education Program Newsworthy Magazine Newsworthy TV Series Events Ethics Resources Sponsor Lists Home

Determination 137
Minnesota News Council

In the matter of the complaint of John Kysylyczyn,
former mayor of Roseville, against Law & Politics magazine

Background

Law & Politics, a monthly magazine aimed at two niche audiences, published a story in its June/July 2003 issue surveying a variety of bizarre political disputes in three Twin Cities suburbs. The story, "The Day the Strippers Tried to Take Over City Hall," was a feature intended to amuse readers.

Complaint

The former mayor of Roseville complained that the story was unfair because it reported ethics charges against him without allowing him or his attorneys to tell his side of the story. He said that the magazine did seek out sources who opposed him, but never called him. He also complained that the magazine’s corrections did not go far enough.

Response

The magazine’s editor, Steve Kaplan, said that Law & Politics is not a standard journalistic enterprise, but rather a niche publication whose audience understands its irreverence and humor. He said that the story was designed as a roundup, nit as a primary reporting assignment, and that it depended upon clippings of newspapers many in the magazine’s audience would remember.

Q & A

Public member Jon Austin, a public relations counselor, asked Kaplan if he would acknowledge that the story, in including comments from sources opposed to the complainant, required a balancing comment from the former mayor.

Editor Kaplan agreed; he said, "The mayor should have been contacted. I assumed he had been, he wasn’t, and that’s a shame. If we were inaccurate, that’s a very serious matter. We did make two corrections. While we do not want to be unfair, I do not believe we were inaccurate in describing the ways the mayor acted [when he was in office}."

Kaplan said that since this complaint arose he had created a new editorial position: fact checker.

Kysylyczyn, the former mayor, was asked about the ethics charges he had faced for allegedly having lobbied the legislature for tax breaks for developers who were suing Roseville. He denied he had done that and reported that the city’s ethics commission had voted down the charges. He filed a claim with the city for reimbursement of $8,000 in expenses for defending himself.

Kaplan said that the seeming political circus in Roseville had prompted him to commission the article. "We mix gravity and levity," he said.

Media members Vicki Gowler, executive editor of the St. Paul Pioneer Press, and Ben Taylor, a Star Tribune vice president, suggested that Law & Politics be transparent in presenting stories, by announcing the magazine’s standard and by labeling articles clearly for what they are.

Kaplan said, "We separate types of stories by use of pictures, graphics, the cover. We signal to our audience that we’re having fun."

Gowler asked, "Is there enough shared understanding among the readers? I thought [the story’s] underpinning was solid, [but] I will read this publication differently in the future. What did you owe the readers? It’s confusing, but not necessarily wrong if readers know what you’re doing."

Kaplan said the magazine distributes 17,000 copies free to lawyers and business people and sells 600 on newsstands.

He said he had offered to publish a letter from Kysylyczyn on the magazine’s web site and to direct readers to it from the corrections column in the print edition. Kysylyczyn said he declined the offer because he sensed that the readers of the print and online versions of the magazine were different people.

He said he was hurt that members of the public might see the article on a coffee table in a lawyer’s office and read a one-sided story.

Anfinson said he thought such a story, appearing in an influential publication and aimed at an influential audience, could ruin a young man’s political career.

Deliberation

Media member Reed Anfinson, editor/publisher of the Swift County Monitor-News in Benson, MN, said, "Even if you publish that kind of story [a light feature], does it give you the right to paint someone in a false light? I get riled when someone writes that small-town politics is funny. I’m from Benson, where we have under 3,500 people, and I can tell you, politics there aren’t funny."

Media member Pat Berg, a journalism teacher at the University of Wisconsin/River Falls, had a different view: "I don’t want to come out against outrageous publication," she said. "It’s the lifeblood of our democracy. If you’re the mayor, you expect to get nicked once in a while, if you swim with the sharks."

Vote

Council members voted 7-3 that the magazine should have included comments from the complainant.

Members voted 6-4 that the magazine’s corrections were inadequate.

June 17, 2004


Read Determination 138

Back to Main Determination Index

Back to News Council Main Page

Want to comment? Send a message to the News Council.


inaccurate...unfair...biased...sensationalized
newspaper...TV...radio...magazine...online news