Determination
45
Minnesota
News Council
In the Matter of the Complaint of
Proctor City Council against the Proctor Journal
The Proctor City Council complained that the weekly
paper:
- Unfairly and incorrectly reported the city's financial
status with respect to tax increases, budgets, and other fiscal
matters during 1981;
- Stated and implied that city council members were
racists and bigots;
- Falsely accused the city council of law violations;
- Quoted councilor Jake Benson as making statements
at council meetings that were, in fact, not made (Benson is also
editor and publisher of the Proctor Journal);
- Exceeded the bounds of journalistic propriety in
its comments about the personal integrity of individual council
members.
The News Council also chose to review a sixth point,
a counterclaim of the newspaper's that the city council members had
ample opportunity to respond in the paper to any comments they did
not agree with, but failed to do so.
Determination of the Council: The Council considers
the crux of the case to be the failure of the newspaper to follow
ethical standards generally accepted by the profession. The Council
will comment briefly on each of the six points considered.
In the News Council's view, the paper failed to show
that figures reported in the newspaper were accurate, or that errors
were due to what it alleged were inaccurate city budgetary reports.
Further, Benson, the source of the paper's governmental coverage,
told the News Council he did not understand municipal finance. The
paper's coverage, through incomplete and faulty reporting techniques,
was inaccurate and misleading on a matter of crucial importance to
the community.
The paper did indeed imply, with such force as to
amount to a statement, that city council members were racists. Through
use of repeated accusatory and inflammatory language the paper could
not have failed to leave this impression in the reader's minds. The
News Council does not find that the city council's silence on that
matter constituted overt racism.
The paper failed to show that a violation of the Open
Meeting Law took place. Depositions submitted were not relevant to
the incident cited in the grievance. Consequently, the paper made
claims about violations without a factual basis for its allegations.
Without such facts, the News Council cannot deny the city council's
charge. The paper failed to offer evidence to support its implications
of misuse of funds or to get comment from (the accused councilor).
In this instance, sloppy writing resulted in unclear, unfair, incomplete
and misleading coverage.
By his own admission, Benson said at the hearing that
he did attribute statements to himself that he did not make at city
council meetings. The News Council finds such a practice irresponsible
and abhorrent. It deplores the paper's method of coverage at city
council meetings and its failure to furnish full and accurate accounts
of its proceedings.
Language used by the paper to describe city council
members far exceeded the bounds of objectivity and went far to belittle
and tarnish the integrity of council members. The News Council deplores
the paper's use of pejorative words and phrases in news stories. It
does not agree with Benson's assertion that advocacy journalism requires
an "always open season on public officials."
It is not the responsibility of the city council to
balance the news by responding to each case of misrepresentation by
the paper. The public would be ill served if news were reported in
a format of statement and rebuttal. The public's right to access and
reply are of paramount importance. Those rights do not, however, relieve
the publisher of responsibility for complete and accurate coverage
in the first instance. In its Statement of Principles, the American
Society of Newspaper Editors calls upon the practitioners of journalism
to be not only industrious and knowledgeable, but also to pursue "a
standard of integrity proportionate to the journalist's singular obligation."
The purpose of journalism, the statement says, is
"to serve the general welfare by informing the people and enabling
them to make judgments on the issues of the time." Without endorsing
any code or statement of principles, it seems evident that journalists
should attempt to assure that news content is accurate, free from
bias, and in context, and that all sides are presented fairly. Journalists
should also be careful in pursuing any activity that might compromise
or seem to compromise their integrity.
The Council finds little evidence that the paper attempts
to be fair and accurate. Indeed, the paper's "singular obligation"
appears to be to attack the persons and activities of the Proctor
City Council without regard to fullness, fairness or accuracy. The
ethical journalistic principles described here may govern newspaper
coverage without damage to the First Amendment.
The complaint against the newspaper is upheld.
Concurring: Allen, Brommer, Brooks, Earley,
Egert, Foley, Myers, Peek, Simonett,* Staples, Ziegenhagen
Concurring in part, dissenting in part: Carlson,
Fairbanks, Fushan, Graven, Higgins, Kramer
*Abstaining: Simonett abstained from participating
in the portion of the determination involving the Open Meeting Law.
March 29, 1982
Read
Determination 46
Back
to Main Determination Index
Want
to comment? Send a message
to the News Council.
