About Us How to file a complaint Outcomes of past hearings Speaker Services Education Program Newsworthy Magazine Newsworthy TV Series Events Ethics Resources Sponsor Lists Home

Determination 59
Minnesota News Council

Cases 55 through 59 all concern media handling of political campaigns and elections and were held on April 12, 1985. Appearing at this multi-case hearing were candidates, political party officials, campaign committee officers, and media representatives. The presentations were thoughtful and informative, and the Council expresses its appreciation to all who participated.

In the Matter of the Complaint of Gary Hayer against the St. Peter Herald

Grievant, an unsuccessful candidate for a state representative seat, claims that the newspaper wrongly accused him of "dirty tricks" in an editorial published after the election.

Background: Gary Hayer was a candidate for the District 23E House seat in the 1984 General Election, running against incumbent Allen Quist. Quist won the election. Two days later, on November 8, the St. Peter Herald published an editorial entitled "Leave the tricks." The editorial stated that with freedom of expression comes a responsibility to use that freedom wisely; and that campaigns should stick to the issues and "dirty tricks" should "be left in the sewer." The editorial went on to illustrate its thesis by referring to two incidents in grievant Gary Hayer's campaign:

"When House District 23B candidate Gary Hayer stated in his campaign literature that his opponent, Allen Quist, was a psychology professor, Hayer knew he was using a misstatement of fact. Although Quist was a teacher for a number of years, he has been a full-time farmer the past two years ...."

"We also found it despicable that a member of a group which had endorsed Hayer's candidacy chose to use the group's newsletter to publish an untruth - that Quist had voted to close the St. Peter Hospital."

Grievant asked the editor, Harry Evanoff, for an opportunity to discuss the matter "over a cup of coffee" but grievant says that the editor refused. Evanoff submitted a written reply to the grievance but was unable to attend the council hearing. In his written response, Evanoff stated he had evidence of other "dirty tricks" but either to protect his sources or because he could not attribute the incidents to the Hayer campaign staff, he did not cite them in his editorial. Further facts will be set out in the discussion which follows.

Discussion: Hayer's committee published an elaborate piece of campaign literature outlining the candidate's views on various issues. Included therein was a reprint of an editorial that had appeared in the October 11 issue of the Mankato Free Press speaking favorably of Hayer's candidacy. One sentence in the Mankato editorial stated, "Gary Hayer, a St. Peter farmer, is a DFLer who wants the District 23B seat held for the last two years by Independent Republican Allen Quist, a psychology professor." This piece of campaign literature was distributed in the St. Peter Herald's shopper to rural routes only.

The facts are that Quist does farm, his farm being only a few miles from the Hayer farm. Quist also had taught psychology at Bethany Lutheran College in Mankato, although apparently not in the most recent two years. In the Legislative Manual, Quist gives his biography as "Professor of psychology, Bethany Lutheran College, farmer." Also, at various election campaign events, Quist apparently had mentioned his background in psychology.

The critical fact to keep in mind, however, is that Hayer did not himself identify Quist as a psychology professor but that this is the designation given Quist by the Mankato Free Press in its editorial, which Hayer only reprinted. It is clear from the content of the Mankato Free Press editorial that Hayer's campaign committee chose to reprint it because of the favorable comments in the editorial about Hayer, not because of the fleeting reference to Quist as a psychology professor. Even if Hayer knew that Quist was a full-time farmer - and this is unclear - it is unfair to suggest that Hayer's failure to edit the reprint was a "dirty trick."

Frankly, the Council sees nothing wrong with Hayer's use of the editorial from the Mankato Free Press. We might add that while rural voters in the St. Peter area might wish to know the relative farming experience of the two candidates, we are not prepared to believe that these voters would consider a masters degree in psychology necessarily to be a disadvantage in their state representative. The second "dirty trick" cited in the editorial refers to an AFSCME newsletter to its members in which the union apparently stated, incorrectly, that Quist had voted to close the St. Peter State Hospital. AFSCME had endorsed Hayer's candidacy. Hayer, however, says neither he nor his campaign committee had anything to do with what was written in the union's newsletter. The newspaper states that Hayer's own campaign literature asks, "Why didn't our present representative immediately and vigorously support, at every opportunity, bills that would most surely benefit St. Peter State Hospital?"

We do not agree with the newspaper that for Hayer to ask this question in his campaign literature is somehow supporting any incorrect or improper statements that AFSCME on its own might be making. The future of the St. Peter State Hospital was evidently a hot issue in the election campaign, and one would expect a challenger to claim that the incumbent could have done more for the hospital while the incumbent, on the other hand, would defend his record. There is nothing before us to suggest any "guilt by association" should attach to Hayer for what AFSCME may or may not have done.

Finally, we regret that the newspaper editor was unable to meet with Hayer. Often, such meetings are helpful to clear up misunderstandings or at least to clarify points of view. The grievance is sustained.

Concurring: Ashmore, Bednar, Brooks, Casey, Chucker, Earley, Forsythe, Graven, King, Myers, Pearce, Peek, Persons, Ryan, Simonett, Sundin and Warder

Abstaining: Falkman - I feel that, in this case, without the newspaper representative present at the hearing to answer questions, certain pertinent facts may be missing.

April 12, 1985


Read Determination 60

Back to Main Determination Index

Want to comment? Send a message to the News Council.


inaccurate...unfair...biased...sensationalized
newspaper...TV...radio...magazine...online news