About Us How to file a complaint Outcomes of past hearings Speaker Services Education Program Newsworthy Magazine Newsworthy TV Series Events Ethics Resources Sponsor Lists Home

Determination 7
Minnesota News Council

In the Matter of the Complaint of
MN Education Association against 32 MN Weekly Papers

The papers are: the Alden Advance, Amboy Herald, Appleton Press, Belview Independent, Bertha Herald, Cass County Independent in Walker, Ellendale Eagle, Ely Miner, Emmons Leader, Fairfax Standard, Heron Lake News, Hinckley News, Hoffman Tribune, Jackson County Pilot, Jordan Independent, Lamberton News, Le Sueur News-Herald, Lyon County Independent in Marshall, Mabel Record, Morgan Messenger, Okabena Press, Oklee Herald, Royalton Banner, Shakopee Valley News, Storden Times, Tri-County News in Kimball, Tri-County Record in Rushford, Twin Valley Times, Waconia Patriot, Walker Pilot, Warroad Pioneer, and West Concord Enterprise.

The Minnesota Education Association (MEA) complained that 32 Minnesota weekly newspapers acted unethically in reprinting a news release verbatim as a news item or editorial without identifying for readers the source of the information.

Background: In the spring of 1973 a Minnesota School Boards Association (MSBA) press release was mailed to all Minnesota newspapers urging opposition to two bills then under consideration by the Legislature. The bills called for binding arbitration of education matters not agreed upon in negotiations between teachers and school boards. Without naming the MSBA as the source of the opinion, the release characterized the bills as "a threat to local government and citizen participation." The press release appeared in print in various forms in newspapers throughout the state in late February and early March. The MEA objected to the way 32 newspapers used the release, complaining that their unattributed presentation could have misled readers into thinking the MSBA opinion was a factual account.

Determination of the Council: The Council must address itself on a large scale to the general problem of attribution of sources and identification of sources in news stories and editorials published in Minnesota newspapers.

With respect to editorials, newspapers that publish editorials from outside sources, or written by persons other than newspaper staff members, should carry attribution as to their source or author. Verbatim non-attribution of source is a breach of faith with readers.

Regarding news stories, attribution or identification of source is a yardstick by which readers can better measure the veracity and reliability of the viewpoints expressed. Such attribution is crucial to readers in evaluating stands taken in regard to political issues or pending legislation.

With respect to news releases, editors should be alerted as to source and purpose of any submitted copy, and inform their readers accordingly. It is clearly within the rights of such organized groups as the MSBA to issue releases but many such groups are powerful lobbies that can push through or block legislation proposed for Minnesota.

Newspapers are encouraged to adopt consistent policies for handling releases and to insist that the source of every release be identified.

Newspapers should jealously guard the credibility of their news columns. The principles of good journalism suggest that readers should clearly be able to differentiate between objective news stories and editorial opinions.

The complaint is upheld against 29 of the 32 newspapers. The other three papers (Alden Advance, Bertha Herald, and Lyon County Independent) were found to have properly given the source of the release; two of the papers that ran the release as an editorial attributed it to two other newspapers, which they presumed to be the source of the editorial, and as such they acted properly.

May 4, 1973


Read Determination 8

Back to Main Determination Index

Want to comment? Send a message to the News Council.


inaccurate...unfair...biased...sensationalized
newspaper...TV...radio...magazine...online news